Administrator

Oppose HB5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support HB5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Support HB5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, In Connecticut, a confiscation petition may be filed only by two law enforcement officers […]

Oppose- AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Support- AAC the Duty to Retreat in a House of Religious Worship Support- AAC Nonlethal Electronic Defense Weapons Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members; I’m opposed to AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant. This bill as yet another political attack on gun owners and the Second Amendment by

OPPOSE Bill #5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant To Whom it May Concern, The Giffords/Bloomberg system, allows petitions to be filed by a very wide variety of people, including ex-girlfriends or ex-boyfriends. Keep Connecticut’s requirement that a petition must be filed by two law enforcement officers, and they must have conducted

OPPOSE- Raised HB-5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Judiciary Committee, I’m opposed to any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case, this will produce a high error rate. Civil liberties will be striped based on one sided judgment. This wrong. Oppose Raised HB-5448. SUPPORT- Raised

Oppose HB5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support HB5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, It is well-known in family and domestic law that ex parte procedures with low standards of evidence are often abused by angry spouses in a divorce, jilted lovers, and

Re: H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT H.B. 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP H.B. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Oppose H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support H.B. 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE

I am Opposed to Bill #5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Sen Winfield, Rep Stafstrom, Members of the Judiciary Committee, If this committee is concerned with legal gun owners’ mental health, why pass a bill that will discourage gun owners from seeking mental health? The current law has is effective. Oppose

Re: OPPOSTITION to H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT.  To: The members of the Judiciary Committee, Any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case will only produce a high rate of abuse. This is constitutional rights you’re talking about.  Keep Connecticut’s requirement that a

Judiciary Committee 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 Judiciary Committee, I’m opposed to HB5448, An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant. There is no need to change Connecticut’s risk warrant law. Currently, the risk warrant is available to anyone at any time, day or night, weekday, weekends or holidays, with police arriving within

Sen Winfield, Rep Stafstrom, Members of the Judiciary Committee, Do not make citizens choose between their civil liberties or mental health. OPPOSE Raised House Bill 5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant. Sincerely, [INSERT NAME] [INSERT TOWN]