Testimony

testimony before state legislature
use TAGs to differentiate years

2020 Testimony – 38

To Whom it May Concern,                 I am writing this letter with concern for the future of our inalienable rights. HB No. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT is a direct attack on our SECOND and FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. Removing personal property based upon often times emotional, one sided hearsay is […]

2020 Testimony – 38 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 54

OPPOSE Bill #5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant To Whom it May Concern, The Giffords/Bloomberg system, allows petitions to be filed by a very wide variety of people, including ex-girlfriends or ex-boyfriends. Keep Connecticut’s requirement that a petition must be filed by two law enforcement officers, and they must have conducted

2020 Testimony – 54 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 70

Judiciary Committee Room 2500 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 OPPOSE: AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. SUPPORT: AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS SUPPORT: AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members, I am opposed to HB5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A

2020 Testimony – 70 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 86

Dear Senator Winfield, Representative Stafstrom, Distinguished Members of the Judiciary Committee, I Oppose H.B. 5448: AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT I Support H.B. No. 5390: AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP I Support H.B. No. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS H.B.

2020 Testimony – 86 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 39

Members of the Judiciary Committee,  OPPOSE HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. This bill is a slippery slope to the erosion of our basic freedoms. The checks and balances of The Constitution is what makes the citizens of this country free from the government. The fourth amendment wasn’t intended to

2020 Testimony – 39 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 55

Oppose- AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Support- AAC the Duty to Retreat in a House of Religious Worship Support- AAC Nonlethal Electronic Defense Weapons Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members; I’m opposed to AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant. This bill as yet another political attack on gun owners and the Second Amendment by

2020 Testimony – 55 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 71

OPPOSE-Raised HB-5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant SUPPORT- Raised HB-5390 An Act Concerning the Duty to Retreat in a House of Religious Worship. SUPPORT- Raised HB-5432 An Act Concerning Nonlethal Electronic Defense Weapons. To Whom it May Concern, HB-5448 expand the list of persons who may seek a risk warrant. Currently,

2020 Testimony – 71 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 40

Judiciary Committee Members,                 OPPOSE HB 5448. We have current “Red Flag” laws which have been in place for over 20 years.  I urge you to strengthen the laws that are currently in place. This bill is simply a reach to strip individuals not only of their property but rights. The inability to refute allegations

2020 Testimony – 40 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 56

Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, Courts have identified seven key elements in procedural due process; 1. Notice 2. A neutral decision-maker 3. An opportunity to make an oral presentation 4. The opportunity to present evidence 5. The opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and respond to evidence 6. Right to representation by counsel 7. A decision

2020 Testimony – 56 Read More »

New Memberships and The CCDL store are temporarily disabled while we upgrade our website.

Scroll to Top