Testimony

I am Opposed to Bill #5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT I am in Support of Bill #5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS I am in Support of Bill #5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Members of the Judiciary Committee, If […]

Judiciary Committee, Please: Oppose H.B. 5448, Support H.B. No. 5390, Support H.B. No. 5432 You must oppose H.B. 5448.  How anyone can think that taking someone’s property and stripping them of their rights should be done based on just accusations is unbelievable.  This is like 3rd World Country policing.  You must oppose HB 5448. Please

Joint Committee on Judiciary Legislative Office Building 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 RE: OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Dear Committee, I am a resident of Connecticut and wish to voice my OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. Rather than

Members of The Judiciary Committee,                 I am writing in regards to HB 5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant. This bill is nothing more than a mask over a gun grabbing agenda. There are current laws written making offenses with firearms illegal, as well as domestic violence offenses. Please make harsher

Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, Courts have identified seven key elements in procedural due process; 1. Notice 2. A neutral decision-maker 3. An opportunity to make an oral presentation 4. The opportunity to present evidence 5. The opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and respond to evidence 6. Right to representation by counsel 7. A decision

SUPPORT H.B. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS SUPPORT H.B. 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP OPPOSE H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT.  To: Judiciary Committee Members; Any bill that will allow a judge to hear only one side of

Dear Senator Winfield, Representative Stafstrom, Distinguished Members of the Judiciary Committee, I strongly urge you to oppose H.B. 5448.  Currently, the risk warrant is available to anyone at any time with police arriving immediately.  It makes no sense for someone to wait till the courthouse opens to file for an “extreme risk” warrant, if someone

Joint Committee on Judiciary 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT To: Members of the Joint Judiciary Committee, HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT is a phony solution created by the same politicians who fail to hold accountable

OPPOSE: Raised HB-5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support: Raised HB-5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Support: Raised HB-5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members, I’m opposed to HB- 5448, keep the due process, allow for an investigation

Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, Courts have identified seven key elements in procedural due process; 1. Notice 2. A neutral decision-maker 3. An opportunity to make an oral presentation 4. The opportunity to present evidence 5. The opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and respond to evidence 6. Right to representation by counsel 7. A decision